Built with state-of-the-art technology, the TATOOSH yacht.
A model of understated luxury, its length is 92 meters and boasts a total of 26 cabins including an owner’s full-beam stateroom and adjoining apartment complex.
Name: | Tatoosh |
Length: | 92 m (303 ft) |
Guests: | 20 |
Crew: | 35 |
Builder: | Nobiskrug |
Interior Designer: | Terence Disdale |
Designer: | Kusch |
Year: | 2000 |
Speed: | 19 knots |
Engines: | Deutz |
Volume: | 3,229 ton |
IMO: | 1006336 |
Price: | US $110 million |
Annual Running Cost: | US $10 -15 million |
TATOOSH yacht interior
The interior of TATOOSH was designed by Terence Disdale, responsible for designing more than 100 yachts in his extraordinary 40-year career.
Known for his originality and flamboyant personality, he designed the yacht to accommodate 20 guests including the owner’s suite that features a comfortable observation lounge with a private gallery and a large secluded deck.
His “beach house not penthouse” style is exhibited in the superyacht’s design which is complete with a heated swimming pool on the main deck, beach club, dive center, cinema, and elevator covering all decks.
Specifications
TATOOSH has a total of 92 meters (303 ft) with a beam of 14.95 meters, a draft measuring 5.16 meters, and a volume of 3,229 GT.
She has two Deutz engines that can power her at 19 knots top speed, an 18-knot cruising speed, and more than six thousand nautical miles range before needing to refuel again.
Exterior
The TATOOSH yacht features an exterior design by Kusch Yachts and has a steel hull and aluminum superstructure.
With an overall length of 303 feet, it is listed as the 88th largest yacht in the world and equipped with stabilizers for a smoother cruise and two helicopter pads – one for the ship’s own helicopter and another for guests’ aircraft.
Being a superyacht, she carries a helicopter, a sailboat, several other boats, large tenders, and toys.
Price
The TATOOSH yacht was built for the mobile phone magnate Craig McCaw but was purchased it in 2001 for a reported US $110 million.
However, the ship’s crew claim that the boat’s mooring position was “explicitly directed” by the local port authority and they were only following the instructions.